The IT Law Wiki

Voda v. Cordis

32,080pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Citation Edit

Voda v. Cordis Corp., 2006 WL 2570614 (W.D. Okla. Sept. 5, 2006), aff’d, 536 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (full-text).

Federal Circuit Proceedings Edit

The Federal Circuit affirmed the denial of an injunction when the district court rejected the licensor patentee’s argument that it could demonstrate irreparable harm to itself based on harm to its exclusive licensee.[1] The exclusive licensee was not joined in the suit, and it appears that the patentee did not provide evidence of how harm to the licensee would directly harm it.[2]

The Court also rejected Voda’s argument that in denying the injunction, the district court was adopting a categorical rule that denied injunctions to non-practicing entities, stating that non-practicing patent holders may be able to obtain an injunction provided they can prove irreparable injury to themselves and satisfy the four-factor test set forth in Ebay v. MercExchange.

References Edit

  1. 536 F.3d at 1329.
  2. Id.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki