The IT Law Wiki

Security Leasing v. Flinco

32,062pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Citation Edit

Security Leasing Co. v. Flinco, lnc., 23 Utah.2d 242, 461 P.2d 460 (1969) (full-text).

Factual Background Edit

The plaintiff supplied a computer under a five-year lease agreement containing an integration clause. Flinco sought to return the equipment, claiming that because of incomplete computer programming the computer could not be used.

Trial Court Proceedings Edit

Since the written contract did not disclose who was to do the programming, the court held that parol evidence was admissible to determine that responsibility.[1] By reviewing the parol evidence, the court determined that the programming was to be done by Security Leasing and sustained Flinco's rejection of the computer system.[2]


  1. 23 Utah.2d at 244, 461 P.2d at 461-62.
  2. Id. at 245, 461 P.2d at 462.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki