The IT Law Wiki

Riley v. California

32,081pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Citation Edit

Riley v. California, 573 U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014) (full-text).

U.S. Supreme Court Proceedings Edit

The Court unanimously held that the warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts held that:

Digital data stored on a cell phone cannot itself be used as a weapon to harm an arresting officer or to effectuate the arrestee's escape. Law enforcement officers remain free to examine the physical aspects of a phone to ensure that it will not be used as a weapon — say, to determine whether there is a razor blade hidden between the phone and its case. Once an officer has secured a phone and eliminated any potential physical threats, however, data on the phone can endanger no one.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki