Fandom

The IT Law Wiki

RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia

32,189pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk0 Share

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Citation Edit

Recording Industry Ass'n of America v. Diamond Multimedia Sys., Inc., 180 F.3d 1072, 51 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1115 (9th Cir. 1999) (full-text).

Factual Background Edit

Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. distributes the Rio, a device that allows a user to listen to MP3s through headphones. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) brought this suit to enjoin the manufacture and distribution of the Rio.

District Court Proceedings Edit

The District Court denied RIAA's motion for a preliminary injunction finding that the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 exempted hard drives and computers and as such did not apply to the Rio.

Appellate Court Proceedings Edit

The Appellate Court affirmed the district court's denial of a motion for preliminary injunction because the Rio is not a digital audio recording device.

The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 states that "no person shall import, manufacture, or distribute any digital audio recording device . . . that does not conform to the Serial Copy Management System ["SCMS"] [or] a system that has the same functional characteristics." [1] To qualify as a DARD the Rio would have to be capable of reproducing digital music recordings.[2]

The Court held that the Rio could only make copies from MP3s stored on computer's hard drives which were specifically exempted from the Act and that the Rio's "operation is entirely consistent with the Act's main purpose — the facilitation of personal use."

References Edit

  1. 17 U.S.C. §1002(a)(1), (2).
  2. Id. §1003(3).

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki