Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
When deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, a court must accept as true all well-pleaded facts and draw all permissible inferences in the plaintiff's favor. There is a strong presumption against dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).
While a complaint "does not need detailed factual allegations, a plaintiff's obligation to provide the 'grounds' of his 'entitlement to relief' requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." "Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact)."
A claim must be dismissed if the complaint does not contain enough facts to make the claim “plausible on its face.”  A claim is plausible on its face if the complaint contains sufficient facts for a court to draw an inference that the defendant is liable for the alleged misconduct.