Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Factual Background Edit
Lockheed, owner of the federally registered mark SKUNK WORKS, sued NSI for direct and contributory trademark infringement, dilution, and unfair competition stemming from NSI’s acceptance of third-party registrations of the domain names “skunkworks.net,” “skunkworks.com,” “skunkwerks.com,” and “skunkworx.com.”
Trial Court Proceedings Edit
NSI filed a motion for summary judgment as to all of Lockheed’s claims. The court granted NSI’s motion in its entirety, holding that NSI could not be liable for direct trademark infringement or unfair competition under the Lanham Act where NSI had not used Lockheed’s mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods or services. The court found that NSI’s use of domain names was connected with their technical function of designating computers hooked up to the Internet, and not with a trademark function of identifying the source of goods or services.
Turning to contributory infringement, the court held that it was inappropriate to hold NSI liable in view of the inherent uncertainty in determining whether the use of a particular term in a domain name infringes the trademark rights of another. The court found that NSI had neither induced infringement nor continued to supply a product when it knew or should have known that its customers were using the product to infringe Lockheed’s service mark. In so holding, the court noted that NSI’s registration of a domain name, without more, did not constitute trademark infringement and announced that NSI had no affirmative duty to police the Internet for possible infringing uses of domain names.
Appellate Court Proceedings Edit
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling, finding that NSI did not supply a “product” or exercise the kind of direct control and monitoring necessary to justify liability for contributory infringement.
- ↑ Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1056 (C.D. Cal. 1997).
- ↑ Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions Inc., 44 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1521 (C.D. Cal. 1997).
- This page uses content from Finnegans Internet Trademark Case Summaries. This entry is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License 3.0 (Unported) (CC-BY-SA).