The IT Law Wiki

In re Wheeling

32,079pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Citation Edit

In re Wheeling, 413 F.2d 1187, 162 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 588 (C.C.P.A. 1969) (full-text).

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Proceedings Edit

Method claims were rejected by the Patent Office as having no novelty other than mental steps. The claims related to the production of an optimum value of a system output function, where the effect of changes in variables upon the function could be determined.

C.C.P.A. Proceedings Edit

On appeal the C.C.P.A. remanded the case for further hearings. The reasoning was that in rejecting claims, the Patent Office failed to state the statutory basis for the rejection. The court further held that the Patent Office must also identify the issues with sufficient clarity that the C.C.P.A. can review them on appeal.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki