The IT Law Wiki

FTC v. ERG Ventures

32,068pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Citation Edit

Federal Trade Comm'n v. ERG Ventures, LLC, Civil Action No.: 3:06-CV-00578-LRH-VPC FTC File No. 062-3192 (D. Nev. Nov. 13, 2006) (Complaint).

Factual Background Edit

The FTC claimed ERG Ventures, LLC and one of its affiliates with tricking consumers into downloading malevolent software by hiding the Media Motor program within seemingly innocuous free software, including screensavers and video files. Once downloaded, the Media Motor program silently activates itself and downloads malwaresoftware that is intrusive, disruptive, and makes it difficult for consumers to use their computers. Among other effects, the malware installed by the Media Motor program:

Many of the malware programs installed by the Media Motor program are extremely difficult or impossible for consumers to remove from their computers.

Trial Court Proceedings Edit

The FTC filed suit, charging that ERG Ventures and its affiliate Timothy P. Taylor have violated the Section 5 of the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive practices. Specifically, the FTC alleged that ERG Ventures and Taylor failed to disclose to consumers that the free software they offered the public was bundled with malware. The agency also charged ERG Ventures and Taylor with using a deceptive End User License Agreement, which gave consumers the option to halt the installation of all software from ERG Ventures, but secretly installed malware whether consumers accepted or rejected the terms of the EULA. The agency also charged ERG Ventures with unfairly downloading software that causes substantial harm to consumers.

Stipulated Final Order Edit

On October 1, 2007, the parties entered into a Stipulated Final Order that permanently barred the defendants except Timothy P. Taylor) from distributing software that interferes with consumers’ computers, including software that tracks consumers’ Internet activity or collects other personal information; generates disruptive pop-up advertising; tampers with or disables other installed programs; or installs other advertising software onto consumers’ computers. The defendants will also be required to fully disclose the name and function of all software they install on consumers’ computers in the future, and to provide consumers with the option to cancel the installation after viewing the disclosure. The defendants will give up $330,000 in ill-gotten gains. Should the court find that the defendants misrepresented their financial status, $3,595,925 – the total revenues from their scam – will be due.[1]

The FTC later obtained a final permanent injunction and monetary judgment against defendant, Timothy P. Taylor.[2]

References Edit

  1. Stipulated Final Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment as to Defendants ERG Ventures, LLC, Elliott S. Cameron, Robert A. Davidson, II, and Garry E. Hill (full-text).
  2. Final Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment as to Defendant Timothy P. Taylor (full-text).

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki