Citation Edit

Electronic Funds & Data Corp. v. Zlobec, No. 99-26830 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty., June 27, 2000).

Factual Background Edit

Plaintiffs sued defendants for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that defendants misappropriated the domain name "" Defendants, without citing any authority, moved for an order depositing the Registrar Certificate for the "" domain name with the court, and/or for an order directing plaintiffs to transfer the domain name to defendants.

Trial Court Proceedings Edit

The court acknowledged that the ACPA did provide for in rem jurisdiction to assert control over a domain name in certain circumstances, but that defendants could not bring such an action because: (1) defendants failed to allege that either party owned a valid trademark; (2) the action was not filed in Virginia, the judicial district of the domain name registrar; (3) defendants failed to identify a party who had "a bad faith intent to profit from the mark;" and (4) the court had personal jurisdiction over all the parties.

Furthermore, New York state law did not permit the court to exercise in rem jurisdiction over the domain name. Because the domain name "registration is not a property right but a right to a contractual performance by Network Solutions, Inc." jurisdiction would be proper only in Virginia.

In denying defendants' motion to transfer ownership of the domain name, the court categorized that motion as a request for a preliminary injunction and noted that defendants failed even to address the merits of the case, let alone their likelihood of success.

Source Edit

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.