Fandom

The IT Law Wiki

Case or controversy

32,196pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk0 Share

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Overview Edit

The case or controversy requirement of Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which constitutes “the irreducible constitutional minimum of standing,”[1] requires that a plaintiff show:

(1) it has suffered an ‘injury in fact’ that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and (3) it is likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.[2]

The party asserting federal jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing these requirements at every stage of the litigation, as it does for “any other essential element of the case.”[3]

On appeal from a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff need only show that the facts alleged, if proven, would confer standing.[4]

References Edit

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992).
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 180-81 (2000).
  3. Central Delta Water Agency v. United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947 (9th Cir. 2002).
  4. See id.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki