Citation Edit

Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp., 361 F. Supp. 325 (E.D. Pa. 1973) (full-text).

Factual Background Edit

This case involved a written contract for computer equipment. Since Burroughs had a practice of not executing written agreements for programming support, Burroughs salesmen orally agreed to provide thirteen programs to plaintiff. These programs were never supplied in working condition.[1] Burroughs contended that the written agreement contained an integration clause excluding all prior statements, including the fact that Burroughs would perform certain programming.[2]

Trial Court Proceedings Edit

The court, however, held that since the hardware was useless without the programming, and the written agreement did not specifically mention the programs, the written contract could not have constituted the entire agreement between the parties and Burrough's oral promise was admissible.[3]

The court held that even though the plaintiff was under a duty to mitigate damages, the burden of proving that the plaintiff had failed to do so was on the defendant.[4]


  1. 361 F. Supp. at 328-29.
  2. Id. at 332.
  3. Id. at 332-33.
  4. Id. at 334.

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.