Wikia

The IT Law Wiki

CBS Interactive v. NFL

31,933pages on
this wiki
Talk0

Citation Edit

CBS Interactive Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass’n, 2009 WL 1151982 (D. Minn. Apr. 28, 2009).

Factual Background Edit

CBS Interactive, (“CBS”), maintains a website, “CBSSports.com,” whereby it operates “fantasy sports” games including fantasy baseball and fantasy football. To facilitate these games (some free and some offered for a fee), CBS compiles and posts news and statistics on professional athletes and publishes player biographies and likenesses.

In years prior to the 2008/2009 NFL regular season, CBS entered into a license agreement with Players Inc. to use, in connection with fantasy football games, the “names, likenesses (including without limitation, [jersey] numbers), pictures, photographs, voices, facsimile signatures and/or biographical information” of NFL players. Players Inc. is a partially-owned subsidiary of the National Football League Players Association (“NFLPA”), which acts as the exclusive collective bargaining representative for active players in the NFL. After the expiration of the license between CBS and Players Inc. in February 2009, Players Inc. approached CBS to discuss CBS’s continued use of the names and statistics of NFL players and demanded payment of licensing fees. CBS refused to make payments, citing an Eighth Circuit decision tht ruled in favor of a fantasy sports vendor and against Major League Baseball.[1]

The Eighth Circuit granted a declaratory judgment in favor of the fantasy sports vendor regarding its use of baseball players’ names and statistics in connection with fantasy baseball. While the court acknowledged that the use of such information without paying a license fee was a violation of the players’ right of publicity, those rights were balanced against First Amendment considerations and vendor was allowed to proceed without payment of fees.

Trial Court Proceedings Edit

In the present case CBS sought summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment allowing it to use the statistics and likenesses of NFL players without the need to pay license fees to Players Inc. Players Inc. argued that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, that summary judgment was premature, and that there were several genuine issues of material fact that distinguished this case from C.B.C’s case regarding fantasy baseball. The court dispensed with Players Inc.’s first two claims and ultimately granted summary judgment in favor of CBS, finding the fantasy baseball case controlling on the issue.

Players Inc. argued that there were differences in the “package” of information about players provided by CBS in connection with fantasy baseball and fantasy football and that the additional information posted in violation of the NFL players’ rights of publicity distinguished this case from the earlier case concerning fantasy baseball, and that to allow CBS to use player information and likenesses without properly licensing them could lead to confusion over NFL endorsement of the CBS webpage.

The court noted that the information provided by CBS in connection with fantasy baseball was actually as extensive as that provided for use in fantasy football and that regardless, under the Eighth Circuit’s decision, the controlling question was not whether the information infringed the players’ rights, but whether it may be used anyway to comport with CBS’s First Amendment rights. With regard to possible confusion over endorsement, the court failed to find any convincing evidence to suggest such confusion would take place and noted that the CBS webpage contained not only the information in question but advertisements for CBS and third parties.

In a "Hail Mary" attempt, Players Inc. argued that the court should delay ruling on the motion for summary judgment to allow time for discovery concerning CBS’s intent in using NFL players’ property without proper licensing. The court, however, held that neither CBS’s business strategy nor its subjective intent factored into its First Amendment right to publish freely available public information.

References Edit

  1. C.B.C. Distrib. & Mktg, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P., 505 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2006) (full-text).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki