The IT Law Wiki

Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers v. Lexmark

32,062pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Citation Edit

Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark Int'l Inc., 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) (full-text).

Appellate Court Proceedings Edit

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a District Court decision that found that the contract terms on the packaging of a printer cartridge were sufficiently clear to act as a "box-wrap" license, such that when the user opens the box he or she is accepting the terms and forming a contract. Because the printer cartridge is patented, Lexmark can impose post-sale conditions on purchasers such as prohibiting the refilling of the cartridge.

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). Smallwikipedialogo.png

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki